Special counsel Jack Smith urges Supreme Court to reject Trump's presidential immunity claim
Related Articles
-
'Audacious': Expert stunned by Trump's latest SCOTUS argument for presidential immunity
Former President Donald Trump's latest filing in the presidential immunity case that will be heard before the Supreme Court next week has shocked one legal expert for its "audacious" claims. Trump's attorneys Monday filed a 33-page response to special counsel Jack Smith's argument that the former president is not protected from prosecution by blanket immunity and therefore can be tried on election interference charges in Washington D.C. federal court. In this new filing, Trump's attorneys build...
-
Donald Trump tells Supreme Court framers of Constitution would back his absolute immunity claim
Former President Trump argued in a Supreme Court brief filed Monday that the Constitution’s framers would have supported his position that a president can’t face criminal prosecution for official acts.
-
US historians file brief with supreme court rejecting Trump’s immunity claim
Fifteen scholars on US history outline that Trump is not immune to prosecution for crimes committed while he was presidentFifteen prominent historians filed an amicus brief with the US supreme court, rejecting Donald Trump’s claim in his federal election subversion case that he is immune to criminal prosecution for acts committed as president.Authorities cited in the document include the founders Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Adams, in addition to the historians’ own work. Continue...