California leaders asked for a Supreme Court homelessness decision. Will it backfire?
Related Articles
-
Ask Jordan: Why was the Supreme Court so focused on what-ifs in Trump's immunity claim?
“During the Supreme Court’s immunity arguments, a majority of the Supreme Court seemed more concerned with the future what-ifs than the here and now. Is there anything that constrains them to confine themselves to the question before them? If they cannot do that in this case, we stand to lose our right to hear Trump’s other trials before the 2024 election.” — Lori G., Kansas City, Missouri Hi Lori, The only thing constraining the Supreme Court is the late Justice William Brennan’s “rule of...
-
People can't be detained just for trying to avoid police, California Supreme Court says
Police officers cannot detain someone on the street just because that person tries to avoid contact with them, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday. The decision has immediate implications for police officers working all across the state, restricting the grounds under which they can stop and hold people for questioning. It could also affect other litigation in which arrests are being challenged, particularly when people of color allege they were detained simply for trying to avoid police....
-
Supreme Court divided on homelessness case that will affect California encampment policy
Supreme Court justices sounded sharply split Monday over whether to give cities in the West more authority to restrict homeless encampments on sidewalks and other public property. The court's three liberals said they were wary of giving cities a broad and unchecked power to use arrests and fines to punish homeless people who are sleeping outside. "Sleeping is a biological necessity," Justice Elena Kagan said. It "seems like you are criminalizing the status of homelessness," she told a lawyer...