The Supreme Court’s decision in Trump’s immunity case could take a sledgehammer to our national security
Related Articles
-
Court should not grant Trump any broad-scale ‘immunity’
Several Supreme Court justices yesterday seemed disturbingly open to far too wide a scope of supposed presidential immunity from criminal prosecution. Almost nothing in the actual text of the Constitution provides for such immunity. At oral argument in Trump v. United States, Justice Clarence Thomas asked the right question of Trump’s attorney, John Sauer: “Could […]
-
Supreme Court hears Trump's immunity claim
On Thursday, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments on whether Donald Trump is immune from prosecution in the alleged election interference case, which was put on hold in February.Thursday morning, Trump told reporters, "A president has to have immunity," the Associated Press reported."If you don't have immunity, you just have a ceremonial president," he added.The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case and consider "whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy...
-
California Takes the Lead in Illegal Migrant Apprehensions
When Texas began to crack down on illegal alien crossings, the border crisis was not solved, but illegals did migrate westward, to the point where radically leftist California is now the hotspot of the Biden border crisis.