Anti-Choice Lawyer Reveals Giant Hole in Logic in SCOTUS Abortion Case
Yahoo - 2024-04-24T17:17:10.000Z

Turns out, the case isn't actually about a conflict between state and federal law, but a desire to deny certain types of care.

In related news

Charges revealed against a former Trump aide and 4 lawyers in Arizona fake electors case
By JACQUES BILLEAUD (Associated Press) PHOENIX (AP) — Authorities revealed Friday the charges filed against an ex-aide of former President Donald Trump and four attorneys in Arizona’s fake elector case, but the names of former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows and lawyer Rudy Giuliani remained blacked out. The Arizona attorney general’s office released a […]
- Related Articles
- In News
- From Reading Eagle
- 2024-04-26T20:16:32.000Z
The US supreme court heard one of the most sadistic, extreme anti-abortion cases yet
Idaho’s law requires doctors to treat pregnant women’s health as disposable – and the loss of their lives as an acceptable riskThe risk of stating plainly what Idaho argued at the US supreme court on Wednesday morning is that it is so sadistic and extreme that people might not believe you. Idaho has one of the most restrictive abortion bans in the country. Prohibiting all abortions at any stage of gestation, with no exceptions for rape or incest, the Idaho law allows doctors to perform abortions...
- Related Articles
- In News
- From The Guardian
- 2024-04-25T10:01:22.000Z
Biden Admin’s Top Lawyer Can’t Explain To SCOTUS How A 1986 Law Suddenly Mandates Abortion
Justices Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett had some questions about the Biden administration's attempt to force states to permit abortions.
- Related Articles
- In News
- From The Federalist
- 2024-04-24T18:04:55.000Z

In related news

Charges revealed against a former Trump aide and 4 lawyers in Arizona fake electors case

The US supreme court heard one of the most sadistic, extreme anti-abortion cases yet

Biden Admin’s Top Lawyer Can’t Explain To SCOTUS How A 1986 Law Suddenly Mandates Abortion