Legal expert flags Trump trial statement that 'comes closest to witness intimidation'
Related Articles
-
Trump is keeping his lawyers from trying a strategy that will help his case: legal expert
The lawyers tasked with swaying a jury in Donald Trump's favor during the second week of the historic criminal hush money trial in New York City are going down a "hard road." That's according to former federal prosecutor Harry Litman. He believes the defense is hamstrung because the 45th president won't let his reputation be tarnished. Even as sordid details of his conduct are slowly fogging the air in the trial that is expected to last six to eight weeks before a jury deliberates.ALSO...
-
Legal expert flags 'proof positive' testimony showing that Trump's main defense fails
Former Donald Trump spokesperson Hope Hicks testified emotionally at her one-time boss' criminal hush money trial in Manhattan on Friday — and, argued legal expert Lisa Rubin on MSNBC, gave prosecutors new ammunition to secure a conviction.A key defense for the former president, noted Rubin, is to say that the alleged hush payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels were not a scheme to defraud the 2016 election, as Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg argues, and were simply an effort to...
-
LAURA INGRAHAM: From day one, Alvin Bragg was on a political mission, not a legal one
Fox News host Laura Ingraham lays out the "conspiracy of dunces" in her opening monologue Tuesday on "The Ingraham Angle." LAURA INGRAHAM: From day one, Alvin Bragg was a man on a political, not a legal, mission. It was to charge Trump with whatever just to keep him in court. Maybe, maybe, get lucky and get a conviction. The truth is the underlying conduct doesn't even merit a misdemeanor charge because there is no intent to defraud without a federal crime in this case. This is a political hit...